<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[rtx pro 6000 max-q配合qwen3.6 MTP开到20收获前所有见的效率]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">之前一直在做模型输出结构优化，MTP一直用在3，生成速度大概稳定在85 tokens/s，无意间发现MTP第三位居然稳定在0.97以上，后续索性把MTP加到10后第十位也居然稳定在0.95以上，干脆一不做二不休再次翻倍开20，单次请求得到如下log。还没有完全优化完，只是边做工作边刻意的想着优化结构化输出，先把工作完成等到后续性能调优再看能不能让数据更漂亮<br />
你怎么看@xiaote</p>
<p dir="auto">(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:19 [<a href="http://loggers.py:273" rel="nofollow ugc">loggers.py:273</a>] Engine 000: Avg prompt throughput: 1818.1 tokens/s, Avg generation throughput: 71.2 tokens/s, Running: 1 reqs, Waiting: 0 reqs, GPU KV cache usage: 23.7%, Prefix cache hit rate: 18.3%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:19 [<a href="http://metrics.py:120" rel="nofollow ugc">metrics.py:120</a>] SpecDecoding metrics: Mean acceptance length: 15.13, Accepted throughput: 0.19 tokens/s, Drafted throughput: 0.22 tokens/s, Accepted: 664 tokens, Drafted: 769 tokens, Per-position acceptance rate: 0.979, 0.894, 0.894, 0.894, 0.872, 0.872, 0.872, 0.809, 0.787, 0.766, 0.745, 0.681, 0.638, 0.553, 0.532, 0.532, 0.468, 0.447, 0.447, 0.447, Avg Draft acceptance rate: 86.3%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:29 [<a href="http://loggers.py:273" rel="nofollow ugc">loggers.py:273</a>] Engine 000: Avg prompt throughput: 0.0 tokens/s, Avg generation throughput: 241.9 tokens/s, Running: 1 reqs, Waiting: 0 reqs, GPU KV cache usage: 24.3%, Prefix cache hit rate: 18.3%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:29 [<a href="http://metrics.py:120" rel="nofollow ugc">metrics.py:120</a>] SpecDecoding metrics: Mean acceptance length: 19.05, Accepted throughput: 229.21 tokens/s, Drafted throughput: 249.11 tokens/s, Accepted: 2292 tokens, Drafted: 2491 tokens, Per-position acceptance rate: 1.000, 0.992, 0.976, 0.976, 0.969, 0.961, 0.953, 0.953, 0.937, 0.929, 0.913, 0.913, 0.898, 0.866, 0.850, 0.835, 0.819, 0.795, 0.764, 0.748, Avg Draft acceptance rate: 92.0%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:39 [<a href="http://loggers.py:273" rel="nofollow ugc">loggers.py:273</a>] Engine 000: Avg prompt throughput: 0.0 tokens/s, Avg generation throughput: 244.4 tokens/s, Running: 1 reqs, Waiting: 0 reqs, GPU KV cache usage: 25.1%, Prefix cache hit rate: 18.3%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:39 [<a href="http://metrics.py:120" rel="nofollow ugc">metrics.py:120</a>] SpecDecoding metrics: Mean acceptance length: 19.55, Accepted throughput: 231.89 tokens/s, Drafted throughput: 247.69 tokens/s, Accepted: 2319 tokens, Drafted: 2477 tokens, Per-position acceptance rate: 1.000, 0.992, 0.992, 0.992, 0.992, 0.984, 0.984, 0.984, 0.976, 0.976, 0.968, 0.944, 0.920, 0.904, 0.880, 0.880, 0.824, 0.808, 0.792, 0.760, Avg Draft acceptance rate: 93.6%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:49 [<a href="http://loggers.py:273" rel="nofollow ugc">loggers.py:273</a>] Engine 000: Avg prompt throughput: 0.0 tokens/s, Avg generation throughput: 248.7 tokens/s, Running: 1 reqs, Waiting: 0 reqs, GPU KV cache usage: 26.0%, Prefix cache hit rate: 18.3%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO 07-28 20:35:49 [<a href="http://metrics.py:120" rel="nofollow ugc">metrics.py:120</a>] SpecDecoding metrics: Mean acceptance length: 20.22, Accepted throughput: 236.40 tokens/s, Drafted throughput: 245.90 tokens/s, Accepted: 2364 tokens, Drafted: 2459 tokens, Per-position acceptance rate: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000, 1.000, 1.000, 1.000, 1.000, 0.984, 0.984, 0.984, 0.967, 0.967, 0.959, 0.951, 0.943, 0.927, 0.902, 0.894, 0.886, 0.870, Avg Draft acceptance rate: 96.1%<br />
(APIServer pid=1565552) INFO:     127.0.0.1:34096 - "POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1" 200 OK</p>
]]></description><link>https://lcz.me/topic/966/rtx-pro-6000-max-q配合qwen3.6-mtp开到20收获前所有见的效率</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:47:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://lcz.me/topic/966.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 21:45:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to rtx pro 6000 max-q配合qwen3.6 MTP开到20收获前所有见的效率 on Thu, 30 Jul 2026 02:22:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kop-wang" aria-label="Profile: kop-wang">@<bdi>kop-wang</bdi></a> <a href="/post/10929">说</a>:</p>
<p dir="auto">但是prefill速度也降了。总体上来讲，目前的重Agent场景，总体性能，prefill和decode速度各占一半。</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">agent得另算，我使用场景关注并发，不关注TTFT等延迟。这个log现在不优化直接开batch=4并发已经可以输出接近1000 tokens/s，还是在我把vllm的gpu利用率限制在0.55情况下，这要升级到0.92后续继续优化我都不敢想，没准直接上1800了</p>
]]></description><link>https://lcz.me/post/10939</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://lcz.me/post/10939</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Xu 0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 02:22:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to rtx pro 6000 max-q配合qwen3.6 MTP开到20收获前所有见的效率 on Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:47:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kop-wang" aria-label="Profile: kop-wang">@<bdi>kop-wang</bdi></a> Agent场景的话就用SG-Lang了，如果要是考虑高并发API访问，VLLM有自己的优势，吐字速度确实是比SG-Lang强。</p>
]]></description><link>https://lcz.me/post/10935</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://lcz.me/post/10935</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:47:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to rtx pro 6000 max-q配合qwen3.6 MTP开到20收获前所有见的效率 on Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:14:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">但是prefill速度也降了。总体上来讲，目前的重Agent场景，总体性能，prefill和decode速度各占一半。</p>
]]></description><link>https://lcz.me/post/10929</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://lcz.me/post/10929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kop wang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:14:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to rtx pro 6000 max-q配合qwen3.6 MTP开到20收获前所有见的效率 on Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:31:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kos-or" aria-label="Profile: kos-or">@<bdi>kos-or</bdi></a> <a href="/post/10927">说</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tony-xu-0" aria-label="Profile: Tony-Xu-0">@<bdi>Tony-Xu-0</bdi></a> <a href="/post/10925">said</a>:</p>
<p dir="auto">Avg generation throughput: 241.9 tokens/s</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">MTP = 20 可以高達這個速度嗎？</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">是的，但是要优化输出结构，实际之后又试了MTP=30/40，请求处理跑起来以后生成速度稳定上350 tokens/s，但是效率收益递减，没再开</p>
]]></description><link>https://lcz.me/post/10928</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://lcz.me/post/10928</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Xu 0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:31:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to rtx pro 6000 max-q配合qwen3.6 MTP开到20收获前所有见的效率 on Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:21:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tony-xu-0" aria-label="Profile: Tony-Xu-0">@<bdi>Tony-Xu-0</bdi></a> <a href="/post/10925">said</a>:</p>
<p dir="auto">Avg generation throughput: 241.9 tokens/s</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">MTP = 20 可以高達這個速度嗎？</p>
]]></description><link>https://lcz.me/post/10927</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://lcz.me/post/10927</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kos or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:21:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>